Illustration of Hwang Dong-man and a woman standing across a barrier at night in We Are All Trying Here

We Are All Trying Here — Why the Korean Title Is Much Darker

Why Netflix Softened “Everyone Is Fighting Their Own Worthlessness” — No Spoilers


Have you ever lost confidence in your own worth? Felt the gap between who you think you are and who you actually are — and not known what to do with it? Wanted comfort — and a drama that stays with you long after it ends.

Then watch this one.

This is the kind of drama that makes you hate people a little less.

It deals with heavy material and somehow remains compulsively watchable. Push through the difficult first two episodes, and you’ll find yourself completely absorbed before you notice it happening.

We Are All Trying Here. The Korean title is far more direct: 모두가 자신의 무가치함과 싸우고 있다 — Everyone Is Fighting Their Own Worthlessness. The gap between the two titles is wide. The Korean title is a diagnosis. The English title is a reassurance. Knowing that difference changes how you watch the drama.


The Problem Is Episodes 1 and 2

You have to get through them. Especially if you struggle with characters who make everything harder for everyone around them.

The protagonist, Hwang Dong-man, is the kind of person you instinctively want to push away. Self-absorbed, oblivious to the effect he has on others, and thoroughly unglamorous. Episodes 1 and 2 lean hard into that discomfort.

That discomfort is intentional.

By episode 3, the writer’s hand becomes visible. The shape of what this drama is actually trying to say comes into focus. The discomfort shifts into something else entirely.

The Writer: Park Hae-young

If you’ve seen My Mister or My Liberation Notes, you already have a sense of what’s coming. Park Hae-young has never once adapted existing source material in her entire career. Every script is original.

Her narratives are built around redemption — not the triumphant kind. This is not Itaewon Class, where the protagonist grinds their way to the top through sheer will. Park Hae-young’s characters don’t win. They endure, and slowly find their way back to breathing. That distinction is everything when it comes to how you watch this drama.

This drama never chases a satisfying revenge or a moment of genuine remorse from anyone who caused harm. That might be the most realistic thing about it.

Four years of silence. The subject she chose to break it with: worthlessness.

The Cast

Koo Kyo-hwan plays Hwang Dong-man — a man twenty years into trying to become a film director, still waiting. Known internationally from D.P. and Parasyte: The Grey, this is his first leading role in a television drama. The unglamorous quality he inhabits here is so convincing it feels less like acting than documentation. It’s impossible not to admire.

Ko Yoon-jung is, honestly, too beautiful for this drama. The moment she appears on screen, something in you asks: what is someone who looks like that doing in a place like this? Her acting answers that question before it fully forms. The immersion is immediate.

Oh Jung-se, Park Hae-jun, Bae Jong-ok. These are actors Korean audiences trust without question. Each one operates at a different register — light, heavy, cold. They are exactly the kind of cast a writer like Park Hae-young attracts. And they raise every scene they’re in.

What This Drama Is Actually About

Worthlessness. Your value is something only you can determine — that’s true. But it’s only when you become someone of value to another person that you can fully feel what that value means. This drama keeps returning to that idea. It is, in the end, a story about redemption and solidarity.

Hwang Dong-man’s wound is simple. Every member of the film industry group of eight friends he started with has debuted. Every one of them moved forward. He alone has stayed in the same place for twenty years. Everyone who started alongside him went somewhere. He is still here. This drama looks directly at that feeling and does not look away.

One of Korean drama’s great strengths is its ability to make unglamorous lives look beautiful. Poverty, shabby circumstances, the grinding texture of failure — rendered here with the quiet dignity of an artist’s life. A protagonist who is not impressive. A person trying to prove their own worth from a place with no visible floor. It may not be exactly our lives — but isn’t some part of it?

Was Twelve Episodes Enough

The only real flaw in this drama is that it’s too short. Anyone who has watched it will agree. This was at minimum a sixteen-episode story.

And yet — within twelve episodes, Park Hae-young said what she came to say. The ending may not feel satisfying in the conventional sense. That is a choice, not a failure. Reality rarely wraps cleanly either.

Basic Info

  • Title: We Are All Trying Here (모두가 자신의 무가치함과 싸우고 있다)
  • Streaming: Netflix
  • Episodes: 12 (complete)
  • Writer: Park Hae-young (My Mister, My Liberation Notes)
  • Director: Cha Young-hoon
  • Cast: Koo Kyo-hwan, Ko Yoon-jung, Oh Jung-se, Park Hae-jun, Kang Mal-geum, Bae Jong-ok

If You’ve Seen Park Hae-young’s Other Work

My Mister → The closest in tone and weight. If that one stayed with you, this one will go deeper.

My Liberation Notes → Quieter and more interior. Watch this after.

Oh Hae-young Again → The lightest of the three. A good entry point if you’re new to Park Hae-young.

Watch We Are All Trying Here first.


Watched it already? The ending goes deeper than it looks.

We Are All Trying Here: Dong-man’s Ending — What the Weather Means

We Are All Trying Here: Eun-a’s Ending — What Her Smile Means

Illustration of Dong-man and Eun-ha sitting together at night in We Are All Trying Here
Illustration: We Are All Trying Here / KwaveInsider

If you’ve already watched this one — which scene made you stop the longest? Leave a comment. I’ll cover it in the next post.

Some links in this post may be affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

perfect-crown-finale-beautiful-drama-lost-the-plot-thumbnail

Perfect Crown Ep 11 & 12 — A Beautiful Drama That Lost the Plot

Gorgeous to look at. Harder to defend.

K-Drama & Film

The ratings were strong. The finale hit a peak minute rating of 16.3%. Disney+ ranked it the most-watched Korean series globally. Fan reactions were passionate — “the chemistry was insane,” “I don’t want it to end.”

But ratings and quality are not the same thing.

Korean historian and popular history lecturer Shim Yong-hwan described the show as “a low-grade alternative history piece from a historical perspective.” Online communities in Korea echoed the sentiment — viewers flagged the weak world-building, the absence of historical logic, and a political structure that never quite held together.

As a Korean who watched every episode: this drama struggled to make its historical and political framework convincing. The gap was filled by IU and Byeon Woo-seok’s visuals, the costumes, and the production design. That combination worked commercially. Whether it’s a good thing is another question.


1. The Living Abdication — The Heaviest Moment in Korean History, Handled in One Episode

A reigning king voluntarily handing the throne to someone else while still alive. It happened here without much weight.

In Korean history, abdication was never simple. The moment a king stepped aside, a new question emerged: who holds the legitimate claim now? That question was always answered in blood.

In the 15th century, King Sejo seized the throne from his nephew, the young King Danjong — and eventually had him killed. In the 18th century, King Yeongjo’s hints at abdication sent ministers into years of political crisis. These weren’t dramatic flourishes. They were the central crises of their eras.

Shim Yong-hwan pointed out that “Prince Ian wielding real power is historically impossible” — after Sejo’s betrayal, Joseon systematically blocked royal relatives from political influence for centuries. The drama ignored that entirely.


2. Abolishing the Monarchy — Unexpected, and Worth Crediting

Ian’s decision to abolish the monarchy at the end was something I didn’t see coming. And honestly, I’ll give the writers credit for it.

Koreans have no particular attachment to monarchy. If you want to understand why, this is worth reading:

Do Koreans Want a Monarchy? What ‘Perfect Crown’ Truly Hides (Part 1)

Perfect Crown’s Hidden History: Why Koreans Can’t Fully Enjoy a Royal Fantasy (Part 2)

The writer is Korean too — and the instinct toward a republic showed. That’s genuinely interesting. The problem is that it came without setup. A twist needs groundwork. This one arrived without any.


3. Prime Minister Min — What Happens When Nobody Studied Constitutional Monarchy

In a constitutional monarchy, real power belongs to the prime minister. The monarch is a symbol. The British king cannot order the arrest of a prime minister. The Japanese emperor cannot dissolve the cabinet.

In this drama, Ian wielded real power throughout. Who controls the investigative agencies? If the prince orders the arrest of the prime minister, does it happen? The drama never answered these questions — because answering them would have exposed how little the political structure held together.

Korean online communities put it plainly: the writers failed to convincingly merge constitutional monarchy as a political system with the rigid class hierarchy the drama was trying to portray. The two things kept colliding.


4. The Prime Minister’s Downfall — Resolved in Five Minutes, for the Wrong Reason

The conspiracy that had been building across twelve episodes was resolved in the finale in under five minutes. And the reason? Betrayal for love.

Here’s why that landed so badly with Korean viewers.

Korean political dramas and historical epics have a tradition: power doesn’t collapse because of emotion. It collapses because of structural contradiction — when the system a villain built turns against them, when their own methods become their undoing. That’s the grammar Korean audiences expect from political storytelling.

“Betrayal for love” is the cheapest exit from that expectation. It reduces a political conflict to a personal one. Viewers who had followed the conspiracy for twelve episodes felt the deflation immediately. Not because the outcome was wrong — but because it was unearned.


5. The In-Law Clan — Gone Without a Fight

For international viewers, a quick explanation: in Joseon, the king’s in-law family — called the “external relatives” or cheok — were among the most dangerous political forces in Korean history. They didn’t accumulate power through dramatic villainy. They did it slowly, over decades, placing their people inside the bureaucracy until they controlled more than the king himself.

This is called Sedo Jeongchi (세도정치) — factional dominance — and it paralyzed the late Joseon dynasty for nearly a century.

In this drama, that accumulated power collapsed without resistance. No institutional reckoning. No structural consequence. A tree with no visible roots, gone in a single gust.


6. The National Museum of Korea and the Baseball Stadium — These Were Good

The finale featured two locations worth noting: the National Museum of Korea and a Korean baseball stadium.

The National Museum of Korea is one of Seoul’s essential destinations. Five thousand years of Korean history under one roof — and free entry. If you’re visiting Seoul, don’t skip it. A dedicated post on what to see there is coming soon.

Korean baseball is its own experience. The stadiums aren’t the scale of MLB parks, but the atmosphere — fried chicken, beer, organized fan chants — is genuinely unlike anything else. Both are worth your time.


Final Thought

Perfect Crown ended the way I feared it would — as a beautiful love story between two beautiful people.

International viewers will find plenty to enjoy. The visuals are stunning, the costumes are extraordinary, and IU and Byeon Woo-seok are genuinely compelling together. But as a Korean watching a drama about Korean history and politics, I can’t recommend it without the caveat: the surface is gorgeous. The foundation wasn’t built.


Want to follow the full cultural context from the beginning?

Ep 1 & 2 — The foundations of Joseon court culture Perfect Crown Ep 1 & 2 — Korean Culture Explained

Ep 3 & 4 — Will Prince Ian seize the throne? Perfect Crown Ep 3 & 4 — Will Prince Ian Seize the Throne?

Ep 5 & 6 — Why Ian is not the real lead Perfect Crown Episode 5–6 Explained — Why Ian Is Not the Real Lead

Ep 7 & 8 — The conspiracy unfolds Perfect Crown Ep 7 & 8 — The Conspiracy Unfolds, and Ian’s Endgame Begins

Ep 9 & 10 — Three refusals and the throne Perfect Crown Ep 9 & 10 — Why Ian Must Refuse the Throne Three Times

Irworobongdo painting from Perfect Crown: Symbol of Joseon Dynasty Royal Authority
Irworobongdo: A Joseon Dynasty court painting symbolizing the omnipresent authority of the King. / Public Domain, Wikimedia Commons

Have you been watching Perfect Crown? Drop your take in the comments — I’m especially curious whether the cultural context changes how you read the ending.

Some links in this post may be affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

Illustrated scene of Perfect Crown first encounter at a traditional Korean archery range

Watching ‘Perfect Crown’? Here’s What Korean Viewers Know That You Don’t

Chaebol, Princes, and Power — The Real History Behind Episodes 1 & 2

K-Drama & Film


Did you enjoy Episodes 1 and 2 of Perfect Crown? That final scene in Episode 2 — you felt it, right? The lavish visuals, the royal fantasy — this kind of drama never gets old.

But while international viewers were enjoying the spectacle, Korean viewers were reading something extra into the same scenes. Historical and cultural codes embedded in the drama — things most audiences outside Korea won’t catch.

This isn’t a spoiler post. It’s a decoder.

Why Koreans feel complicated watching royal fantasies has been covered in a separate post. This one focuses on three specific elements already introduced in Episodes 1 and 2 — and what they mean.

Video: Perfect Crown Highlight Trailer / Source: Disney+ Singapore (YouTube)

1. The Queen Mother’s Family — Why That Detail Matters

In Perfect Crown, the queen mother comes from a family that has produced four queens. That detail gets repeated. Korean viewers catch it immediately — because they’ve seen this story before.

In 15th-century Joseon Korea, there was a man named Han Myeonghoe. He wasn’t the king. He was an official. But he married four of his daughters into the royal family. Four queens. One father. He effectively ran the country from the outside.

Here’s the simplest way to understand it. The king was the face. The real power belonged to the king’s father-in-law. In Korean, this is called waecheok (외척) — the queen’s family seizing control. It was the thing the Joseon Dynasty feared most.

They tried to prevent it. They failed. History repeated itself.

In the late 18th century, one of Joseon’s most brilliant kings — King Jeongjo — died young, leaving behind a child son. On his deathbed, he entrusted the boy to his most trusted official. That official became the boy-king’s father-in-law. The result? For the next sixty years, that family ran Korea. The king existed. But he was a figurehead. Many historians trace the eventual collapse of the Joseon Dynasty directly back to this moment.

When Korean viewers see the queen mother’s family described as having produced four queens in Perfect Crown — they tense up. Because they know exactly how this pattern ends.

Gyotaejeon Hall Gyeongbokgung Palace Seoul queen's residence Joseon Dynasty Korea
Gyotaejeon Hall, Gyeongbokgung Palace — the queen’s residence in the Joseon Dynasty / Photo: Jeon Young, Kim(Seoul, Korea) / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 5.0)

2. The Grand Prince — The Most Dangerous Position in the Palace

In the drama, Grand Prince Yi-an is shown helping to govern and support the king. International viewers might read this as simply “a good prince helping out.” Korean viewers read something more complicated.

First, what is a grand prince? In Joseon, a daegun (대군) was a son born to the king by his official queen — a legitimate royal prince. Sounds prestigious. The reality was darker.

A capable grand prince was dangerous. He was a potential rival to the crown prince. Historically, capable grand princes were exiled or killed. In the drama, a news article describes Grand Prince Yi-an as “a modern-day Prince Suyang.” Korean viewers know exactly what that means.

Prince Suyang was a grand prince in the 15th century. He was capable, ambitious — and ultimately, he killed his young nephew, the king, and took the throne himself. He eliminated dozens of rivals along the way.

And here’s the other thing: in actual Joseon history, a king’s regent was always his mother — never his brother or uncle. A grand prince acting as regent simply did not happen. So while Yi-an appears to be helpfully governing in the drama, in historical reality he would be in a precarious position — his life potentially threatened by the very queen mother whose family holds the real power.

Will Yi-an protect his nephew to the end? Or will he become Prince Suyang? That’s the real question this drama is asking.


3. Chaebol — The Republic’s Modern Aristocracy

Samsung. Hyundai. LG. These names are familiar worldwide — smartphones, cars, televisions. But when Koreans look at these companies, they don’t just see products. They see chaebol.

The easiest way to understand chaebol: imagine Steve Jobs had handed Apple not to a qualified successor, but to his children — regardless of their ability. In the United States, that would trigger congressional hearings and wall-to-wall media coverage. In Korea, this has been happening for decades. Companies are inherited by blood, not by merit.

How did this happen? The origins of chaebol go back to the Korean War in the 1950s. The war left Korea in ruins. But there were entrepreneurs with ambition. They created something from nothing and achieved remarkable things. Much of Korea’s economic success today is owed to them. However, their growth also took place in partnership with authoritarian governments of the time.

South Korea’s constitution states that all citizens are equal. There is no aristocracy. But economic inequality clearly exists. And in practice, the chaebol families — passing wealth down through generations — look very much like a modern aristocracy.

The fact that Seong Hee-ju in Perfect Crown comes from a chaebol family but lacks royal status is not accidental. The drama places these two worlds side by side and asks the sharpest question in modern Korean society: what’s the real difference?


Films That Bring This History to Life

The Man Who Lived with the King (왕과 사는 남자, 2026) — Currently in Korean theaters

Han Myeonghoe — the man who placed four daughters on the throne — is a central character. The perfect companion piece to Perfect Crown. A major hit in Korea right now. Watch for the OTT release.

Video: The King’s Warden (왕과 사는 남자) Official Trailer / Source: Central City Media (YouTube)

The Face Reader (관상, 2013) — Netflix

Prince Suyang — the historical figure referenced in the drama — is the central antagonist. Lee Jung-jae, known internationally from Squid Game, plays Suyang. Song Kang-ho, known from Parasite, plays the face reader at the center of the story. This film shows exactly how a capable prince seized the throne — and what it cost everyone around him. Essential viewing. You won’t regret it.

Watch on Netflix →

Video: The Face Reader (관상) Official Trailer / Source: 213 Pictures & Media (YouTube)

This series continues. I’ll be back after Episodes 3 and 4.

Does your country have a modern aristocracy? Leave a comment — I’d genuinely like to know.


Some links in this post may be affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

Illustrated scene of Perfect Crown first encounter at a traditional Korean archery range

Perfect Crown Story: Why Koreans are Obsessed (and Why You Should Be Too)

MBC · Disney+ · April 10, 2026 — From a Korean who loves K-drama and film

K-Drama & Film


IU and Byeon Woo-seok. Same screen for the first time. A royal romance set in a modern Korea that never abolished its monarchy. If you’ve been anywhere near K-drama social media this week, you already know the noise around Perfect Crown. Here’s why it’s justified — and one reason to stay cautious — from a Korean who loves K-drama and film.

Video: Perfect Crown 1st Teaser Trailer / Source: Disney+ Singapore (YouTube)

What It’s About

Perfect Crown is set in a reimagined modern Korea operating under a constitutional monarchy. Seong Hee-ju (IU) is the CEO of a cosmetics conglomerate — brilliant, wealthy, and perpetually denied respect because she was born out of wedlock. Grand Prince Yi-an (Byeon Woo-seok) is the king’s second son — beloved by the public, powerless within his own family.

A contract marriage brings them together. What starts as a calculated arrangement gets complicated fast.

Classic rom-com architecture. The execution is everything.


Why Korea — A Republic — Can’t Stop Making Royal Fantasies

This is the part that confuses international viewers. Korea abolished its monarchy over a century ago. So why does the royal romance formula keep working here?

Living in Seoul, here’s what I observe.

Joseon lasted 500 years. That’s not ancient history — it’s in the language, the architecture, the food, the way people address each other. The Republic of Korea is barely 80 years old. The cultural memory of a royal order runs deeper than the political reality.

And paradoxically, the absence of an actual monarchy is exactly what makes it work as fantasy. Britain has a real royal family, so royal romance becomes tabloid. Korea has no royal family — which means the setting carries zero real-world baggage. It’s pure imagination.

Add to that the rom-com engine: the genre runs on the gap between two people. The wider the gap, the stronger the pull. Chaebol vs. commoner works. Royal vs. commoner is the maximum version of the same formula.

Perfect Crown plants its story right at the intersection of those two worlds — a chaebol heiress who lacks royal status, and a prince who lacks everything else. The gap runs in both directions. For a real look at what Korean royal history left behind, the palaces are still standing in Seoul — we covered them in our Seoul itinerary.


IU — Why This Choice Matters

If you came to IU through My Mister or When Life Gives You Tangerines, Perfect Crown will feel like a gear shift. Those were heavy. Dense with silence and accumulated grief. The kind of drama you don’t consume — it consumes you.

Video: When Life Gives You Tangerines Official Trailer / Source: Netflix (YouTube)

This is a rom-com.

I’ll be honest: I once tried to get IU involved in a project I was working on. Called her agency. Got turned down — and I suspect the call never even reached her. The project wasn’t big enough. No hard feelings. But it confirmed something I’d already sensed: this is someone who makes her own calls.

IU doesn’t seem like someone who takes roles just to stay visible. When she moves into lighter territory, it feels like a deliberate pivot — not a commercial calculation.


Byeon Woo-seok — First Rom-Com Since Lovely Runner

Byeon Woo-seok’s Lovely Runner (2024) turned him from a familiar face into a global phenomenon. This is his first full romantic lead since then. The pressure is real.

Video: Lovely Runner Official Trailer / Source: CJ ENM Global (YouTube)

Worth noting: he and IU have history on screen. In Moon Lovers: Scarlet Heart Ryeo (2016), he played one of IU’s love interests — a supporting role in a crowded ensemble. A decade later, they’re front and center together. That’s a full-circle moment the fandom will not let go of.


The Team Behind It

Director Park Joon-hwa helmed What’s Wrong with Secretary Kim (2018) and the Alchemy of Souls series (2022–23). He knows how to pace a romance and how to keep fantasy grounded. Good fit for this material.

The screenplay comes from Yoo Ji-won, adapted from a script that won the 2022 MBC Drama Screenplay Contest. The original concept was developed by Yoo Ah-in — yes, the actor.


Basic Info

  • Network: MBC (Korea), Disney+ (global), Hulu (US)
  • Premiere: April 10, 2026
  • Schedule: Every Friday and Saturday, 9:40 PM KST
  • Episodes: 12
  • Cast: IU, Byeon Woo-seok, Noh Sang-hyun, Gong Seung-yeon

One Thing to Watch For, One Thing to Watch Out For

Watch for — IU in full comedy mode. Her comic timing has never been the main event before. It is here.

Watch out for — the setup is almost too familiar. Contract marriage, dual outsiders, social hierarchy as obstacle. K-drama has run this play many times. The question is whether the writing and chemistry can make it feel earned rather than assembled.

IU picked this. That’s enough for me to give it the first episode.


Some links in this post may be affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.