Joseon – K-wave Insider

Gorgeous to look at. Harder to defend.

K-Drama & Film

The ratings were strong. The finale hit a peak minute rating of 16.3%. Disney+ ranked it the most-watched Korean series globally. Fan reactions were passionate — “the chemistry was insane,” “I don’t want it to end.”

But ratings and quality are not the same thing.

Korean historian and popular history lecturer Shim Yong-hwan described the show as “a low-grade alternative history piece from a historical perspective.” Online communities in Korea echoed the sentiment — viewers flagged the weak world-building, the absence of historical logic, and a political structure that never quite held together.

As a Korean who watched every episode: this drama struggled to make its historical and political framework convincing. The gap was filled by IU and Byeon Woo-seok’s visuals, the costumes, and the production design. That combination worked commercially. Whether it’s a good thing is another question.

1. The Living Abdication — The Heaviest Moment in Korean History, Handled in One Episode

A reigning king voluntarily handing the throne to someone else while still alive. It happened here without much weight.

In Korean history, abdication was never simple. The moment a king stepped aside, a new question emerged: who holds the legitimate claim now? That question was always answered in blood.

In the 15th century, King Sejo seized the throne from his nephew, the young King Danjong — and eventually had him killed. In the 18th century, King Yeongjo’s hints at abdication sent ministers into years of political crisis. These weren’t dramatic flourishes. They were the central crises of their eras.

Shim Yong-hwan pointed out that “Prince Ian wielding real power is historically impossible” — after Sejo’s betrayal, Joseon systematically blocked royal relatives from political influence for centuries. The drama ignored that entirely.

2. Abolishing the Monarchy — Unexpected, and Worth Crediting

Ian’s decision to abolish the monarchy at the end was something I didn’t see coming. And honestly, I’ll give the writers credit for it.

Koreans have no particular attachment to monarchy. If you want to understand why, this is worth reading:

Do Koreans Want a Monarchy? What ‘Perfect Crown’ Truly Hides (Part 1)

Perfect Crown’s Hidden History: Why Koreans Can’t Fully Enjoy a Royal Fantasy (Part 2)

The writer is Korean too — and the instinct toward a republic showed. That’s genuinely interesting. The problem is that it came without setup. A twist needs groundwork. This one arrived without any.

3. Prime Minister Min — What Happens When Nobody Studied Constitutional Monarchy

In a constitutional monarchy, real power belongs to the prime minister. The monarch is a symbol. The British king cannot order the arrest of a prime minister. The Japanese emperor cannot dissolve the cabinet.

In this drama, Ian wielded real power throughout. Who controls the investigative agencies? If the prince orders the arrest of the prime minister, does it happen? The drama never answered these questions — because answering them would have exposed how little the political structure held together.

Korean online communities put it plainly: the writers failed to convincingly merge constitutional monarchy as a political system with the rigid class hierarchy the drama was trying to portray. The two things kept colliding.

4. The Prime Minister’s Downfall — Resolved in Five Minutes, for the Wrong Reason

The conspiracy that had been building across twelve episodes was resolved in the finale in under five minutes. And the reason? Betrayal for love.

Here’s why that landed so badly with Korean viewers.

Korean political dramas and historical epics have a tradition: power doesn’t collapse because of emotion. It collapses because of structural contradiction — when the system a villain built turns against them, when their own methods become their undoing. That’s the grammar Korean audiences expect from political storytelling.

“Betrayal for love” is the cheapest exit from that expectation. It reduces a political conflict to a personal one. Viewers who had followed the conspiracy for twelve episodes felt the deflation immediately. Not because the outcome was wrong — but because it was unearned.

5. The In-Law Clan — Gone Without a Fight

For international viewers, a quick explanation: in Joseon, the king’s in-law family — called the “external relatives” or cheok — were among the most dangerous political forces in Korean history. They didn’t accumulate power through dramatic villainy. They did it slowly, over decades, placing their people inside the bureaucracy until they controlled more than the king himself.

This is called Sedo Jeongchi (세도정치) — factional dominance — and it paralyzed the late Joseon dynasty for nearly a century.

In this drama, that accumulated power collapsed without resistance. No institutional reckoning. No structural consequence. A tree with no visible roots, gone in a single gust.

6. The National Museum of Korea and the Baseball Stadium — These Were Good

The finale featured two locations worth noting: the National Museum of Korea and a Korean baseball stadium.

The National Museum of Korea is one of Seoul’s essential destinations. Five thousand years of Korean history under one roof — and free entry. If you’re visiting Seoul, don’t skip it. A dedicated post on what to see there is coming soon.

Korean baseball is its own experience. The stadiums aren’t the scale of MLB parks, but the atmosphere — fried chicken, beer, organized fan chants — is genuinely unlike anything else. Both are worth your time.

Final Thought

Perfect Crown ended the way I feared it would — as a beautiful love story between two beautiful people.

International viewers will find plenty to enjoy. The visuals are stunning, the costumes are extraordinary, and IU and Byeon Woo-seok are genuinely compelling together. But as a Korean watching a drama about Korean history and politics, I can’t recommend it without the caveat: the surface is gorgeous. The foundation wasn’t built.

Want to follow the full cultural context from the beginning?

Ep 1 & 2 — The foundations of Joseon court culture Perfect Crown Ep 1 & 2 — Korean Culture Explained

Ep 3 & 4 — Will Prince Ian seize the throne? Perfect Crown Ep 3 & 4 — Will Prince Ian Seize the Throne?

Ep 5 & 6 — Why Ian is not the real lead Perfect Crown Episode 5–6 Explained — Why Ian Is Not the Real Lead

Ep 7 & 8 — The conspiracy unfolds Perfect Crown Ep 7 & 8 — The Conspiracy Unfolds, and Ian’s Endgame Begins

Ep 9 & 10 — Three refusals and the throne Perfect Crown Ep 9 & 10 — Why Ian Must Refuse the Throne Three Times

Irworobongdo painting from Perfect Crown: Symbol of Joseon Dynasty Royal Authority — Irworobongdo: A Joseon Dynasty court painting symbolizing the omnipresent authority of the King. / Public Domain, Wikimedia Commons

Have you been watching Perfect Crown? Drop your take in the comments — I’m especially curious whether the cultural context changes how you read the ending.

Some links in this post may be affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

Korea’s Painful Road to Democracy and the Glory of the Republic

K-Drama & Film

Perfect Crown — the new MBC drama starring IU and Byeon Woo-seok — is built around a fantasy: a modern Korea with a royal family, a palace, and a monarchy that never disappeared. International viewers are loving it. But for many Koreans watching the same drama, something quietly uncomfortable stirs.

Do Koreans truly want a monarchy?

According to a survey on constitutional reform and power structure preferences conducted in 2024–2025, over 70% of Koreans overwhelmingly preferred a presidential system. A parliamentary or power-sharing system came in at around 10%. A constitutional monarchy wasn’t even included as an option.

Why do Koreans feel so strongly about their republic? The answer requires some history.

Video: Perfect Crown Highlight Trailer / Source: Disney+ Singapore (YouTube)

Joseon — 500 Years of Legacy

The Joseon Dynasty ruled from 1392 to 1897 — over five centuries. King Sejong created Hangul, the Korean alphabet. Ceramics and painting flourished at a world-class level. A Confucian-based governance system, civil service examinations, and medical institutions — the cultural legacy Joseon left behind is still alive in the daily life of Koreans today.

Living in Seoul, I feel it. Standing in front of Gyeongbokgung Palace, walking through the rear garden of Changdeokgung — you feel in your bones how deep this country’s roots go. Joseon is not simply history. It is Korean identity itself.

For a closer look at Joseon’s palaces still standing in Seoul today, our Seoul itinerary covers them in detail.

Irworobongdo Joseon Dynasty royal court painting sun moon five peaks Korea — *Irworobongdo: A Joseon Dynasty court painting symbolizing the omnipresent authority of the King. / Public Domain, Wikimedia Commons*

The Glory of Joseon — and Its Shameful End

Five hundred years of greatness. But the ending was devastating.

In the late 19th century, imperial Japan extended its reach toward Joseon. The dynasty’s response was weak and cowardly. King Gojong thought primarily of his own survival. A faction of officials chose to collaborate with Japan rather than defend the nation.

In 1894, an estimated one million peasants joined the Donghak Peasant Movement in an attempt to protect the country. Gojong and the ruling class turned their backs on them — and instead allied with Japan to slaughter the very people who had risen up. Joseon destroyed its own last chance at survival.

In 1905, the Eulsa Treaty stripped Korea of its diplomatic sovereignty. In 1910, Japan formally annexed Korea. The dynasty was gone.

Five hundred years of history — ended this way. Many Koreans feel something beyond sorrow about this chapter. Something closer to rage. This is part of why the lavish royal fantasy in Perfect Crown doesn’t land as pure escapism for Korean viewers.

Resistance — The Fight to Take Back a Nation

Koreans are not, by nature, a people who submit.

Survival on a small peninsula surrounded by powerful neighbors — China, Japan — required constant resistance across centuries. A people who love peace but will not tolerate injustice. Both China and Japan, across thousands of years of shared history, have acknowledged this.

On March 1, 1919, independence uprisings broke out across the country. Students, farmers, and religious leaders took to the streets. Japan suppressed the movement by force — thousands were killed. But the spirit of that day did not die. Koreans moved to Manchuria in large numbers to begin guerrilla resistance. The term Uibyeong — volunteer soldiers, ordinary citizens fighting injustice with no official status — has roots stretching back to Korea’s resistance against the Mongols in the Goryeo period.

These fighters reorganized as independence armies, and when the Korean Provisional Government was established in Shanghai, they were folded into the Gwangbokgun — the Liberation Army. The modern Republic of Korea’s military traces its origins directly to the Gwangbokgun.

Korean independence activists released from prison August 1945 liberation from Japanese colonial rule — *Korean political prisoners released upon liberation, August 16, 1945 / Unknown author / Public Domain, Wikimedia Commons*

Liberation — But Division

In August 1945, atomic bombs fell on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Japan surrendered. Korea was liberated — but not by its own hand. The Provisional Government went unrecognized. The independence movement that had sacrificed so much was not given its due. This remains one of the most painful chapters in how Koreans remember their modern history.

And then came division. Under the pretext of disarming Japanese forces, Soviet troops occupied the north of the peninsula and American forces the south. That division has lasted to this day.

Films That Help You Understand This Era

These are essential. And genuinely gripping.

Mr. Sunshine (2018)

Set in the early 1900s during the final years of the Korean Empire. A Korean-born US Marine officer and a noblewoman fighting as a resistance fighter — against the backdrop of a nation losing itself. Starring Lee Byung-hun and Kim Tae-ri. Written by Kim Eun-sook, directed by Lee Eung-bok. Visually stunning, emotionally devastating. The polar opposite of the royal fantasy Perfect Crown offers.

Watch on Netflix →

Assassination (2015)

Set in 1933 colonial-era Gyeongseong (Seoul). A mission to assassinate a pro-Japanese collaborator — and the people caught in the middle. Starring Jun Ji-hyun, Lee Jung-jae, and Ha Jung-woo. One of the top five highest-grossing Korean films ever made. This is not just action entertainment — the weight of the choices these characters make stays with you.

Watch on Netflix →

The Age of Shadows (2016)

Set in the 1920s. A Korean officer serving the Japanese police finds himself pulled toward the independence movement he is supposed to be hunting. Starring Song Kang-ho and Gong Yoo, directed by Kim Jee-woon. If you enjoy le Carré-style spy fiction, this film is essential.

DVD / Blu-ray →

A Drama Is a Drama — But

Perfect Crown is a good drama. IU and Byeon Woo-seok’s chemistry works. The rom-com mechanics are well-executed. It’s enjoyable.

But the complicated feeling many Koreans have while watching it is separate from the drama’s quality. Enjoying the royal fantasy while feeling quietly unsettled by it — understanding where that discomfort comes from changes how you read the show.

Know why the crown disappeared, and you’ll understand why it still feels heavy.

In Part 2, we’ll look at what happened after liberation — how Korea fought to build its republic, what that cost, and why Koreans today wear that history with pride.

Korea has a long history. If watching Perfect Crown has sparked any questions about Korean history or culture, leave them in the comments — I’ll cover them in a future post.